top of page
Search

Correction Is a Ministry of Reconciliation, Not a Ministry of Being Right

Aug 29
6 min read

There is a difference between correcting someone because you love them and correcting someone because you need them to know you are right.

Both may use Scripture.

Both may identify something that is genuinely wrong.

Both may even say the exact same words.

But the heart behind them can be completely different.

As believers, we have absolutely been called to stand for truth. Scripture tells us to test what we hear, reject false teaching, correct error, and refuse to compromise the Gospel.

But we need to remember something incredibly important:

God did not give us a ministry of being right. He gave us a ministry of reconciliation.

Paul writes:

“Now all things are of God, who has reconciled us to Himself through Jesus Christ, and has given us the ministry of reconciliation.”— 2 Corinthians 5:18 NKJV

That changes how we should understand biblical correction.

The goal of correction isn't simply to expose what is wrong.

The goal is to help restore what has been broken.


The Goal Is to Gain Your Brother


Jesus gives us one of the clearest pictures of biblical correction in Matthew 18.

“Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained your brother.”— Matthew 18:15 NKJV

Notice the language Jesus uses.

You have gained your brother.

That is reconciliation language.

Jesus doesn't say:

“You proved him wrong.”

“You exposed him.”

“You showed everyone what kind of person he really is.”

“You won the argument.”

He says you gained your brother.

That means the success of biblical correction cannot simply be measured by whether I demonstrated that my position was correct.

The question is also:

Did I pursue my brother?

Did my correction point them toward Christ?

Did I leave room for repentance?

Did I desire restoration?

Did I approach them hoping the relationship could be healed?

Or was I secretly hoping to prove that I understood something they didn't?


Truth Is Not a Weapon to Hold Over Someone


Knowledge can become dangerous when pride gets involved.

Paul warned:

“Knowledge puffs up, but love edifies.”— 1 Corinthians 8:1 NKJV

Knowledge itself isn't the enemy. We need biblical knowledge.

But knowledge without love can become something we use to elevate ourselves over other people.

Suddenly correction stops sounding like:

“Brother, I'm concerned about you.”

And starts sounding like:

“Let me show you why you're wrong.”

Those are not necessarily the same thing.

One seeks restoration.

The other seeks recognition.

One wants the person healed.

The other wants the person defeated.

And this is where we have to examine ourselves carefully.

If my biblical knowledge becomes something I hold over you rather than something I use to help restore you, I have missed the purpose of correction.


Restore Them Gently


Paul gives instructions about what should happen when someone is caught in sin:

“Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness, considering yourself lest you also be tempted.”— Galatians 6:1 NKJV

Again, look at the word:

Restore.

Not destroy.

Not humiliate.

Not publicly shame.

Not make an example out of them so everyone knows how discerning we are.

Restore.

And then Paul immediately tells the person doing the correcting to examine themselves.

Why?

Because correction can become pride incredibly quickly.

The moment I begin thinking, “How could they possibly believe that?” I should remember how many times I have misunderstood something.

The moment I think, “I would never fall into that,” Scripture tells me to consider myself.

The spiritually mature person isn't merely capable of recognizing someone else's error.

The spiritually mature person can recognize error without becoming prideful because they recognized it.


The Ministry of Reconciliation Changes Our Approach


Paul says something remarkable about our calling:

“Now then, we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God were pleading through us: we implore you on Christ's behalf, be reconciled to God.”— 2 Corinthians 5:20 NKJV

Think about that.

We are representatives of Christ.

So when we approach someone who is wandering, our concern should be that our response accurately represents the One who sent us.

Jesus confronted sin.

Jesus exposed hypocrisy.

Jesus spoke incredibly hard truths.

But Jesus also ate with sinners.

He restored Peter after Peter denied Him.

He protected the woman caught in adultery from condemnation while still telling her to leave her sin.

Jesus never compromised truth in order to demonstrate love.

But neither did He abandon love in order to demonstrate truth.

In Christ, truth and reconciliation work together.

That should be true of us as well.


Correction Should Lead Toward Christ


This gives us a simple question to ask before correcting someone:

Where am I trying to lead them?

If the destination is simply agreement with me, something is wrong.

If the destination is humiliation, something is wrong.

If the destination is winning an argument, something is wrong.

If the destination is getting other people to recognize how wrong they are, something is wrong.

Biblical correction should ultimately point toward Christ.

Paul told Timothy:

“And a servant of the Lord must not quarrel but be gentle to all, able to teach, patient, in humility correcting those who are in opposition.”— 2 Timothy 2:24–25 NKJV

Truth doesn't need our arrogance to defend it.

We can be firm without being cruel.

We can disagree without dishonoring.

We can correct without humiliating.

And sometimes the strongest correction can come from someone whose love for us is impossible to question.


What About Someone Who Refuses Correction?


Reconciliation does not mean pretending sin doesn't exist.

It also doesn't mean every relationship will always be restored.

Jesus continues in Matthew 18 by explaining what should happen when someone refuses to listen. Others become involved, and eventually the matter can come before the church.

There are boundaries.

There is church discipline.

There are situations where separation becomes necessary.

But notice something important:

Separation comes after attempts at reconciliation—not instead of them.

Biblical discipline is not permission to enjoy someone's downfall.

Even when someone refuses correction, our heart should not become:

“Good. Now everyone knows I was right.”

Our heart should remain:

“I pray they come back.”

That is the heart of reconciliation.


Sometimes We Correct the Wrong Thing


There is another reason humility matters.

Sometimes we are wrong.

Sometimes what we called false teaching was actually our misunderstanding.

Sometimes what we called rebellion was simply disagreement.

Sometimes what we called discernment was preference.

Sometimes we approached someone intending to correct them only to discover that God needed to correct us too.

That is why someone pursuing reconciliation approaches correction differently than someone pursuing victory.

If I'm pursuing victory, I cannot afford to be wrong.

But if I'm pursuing truth, I can say:

“I misunderstood. Forgive me.”

That's not weakness.

That's maturity.

We aren't supposed to be defending our position at all costs.

We are supposed to be seeking Christ at all costs.


Correction Should Leave the Door Open


I believe one of the greatest tests of biblical correction is what we desire after the conversation is over.

Do I want them restored?

Do I want them healed?

Do I want fellowship restored?

Would I celebrate if they repented tomorrow?

Would I embrace them if they came back?

Because biblical correction isn't about putting someone beneath us.

It's about reaching toward someone and saying:

“Come back.”

Come back to truth.

Come back to Christ.

Come back to fellowship.

Come back into right relationship.

And whenever possible, come back into relationship with me too.

There will be times when people reject that invitation. There will be situations where healthy boundaries remain necessary. Reconciliation requires truth and, often, repentance.

But broken relationship should never be the prize we were pursuing.


We Were Reconciled Before We Became Reconcilers


Perhaps the greatest protection against pride in correction is remembering our own story.

Paul says God “reconciled us to Himself through Jesus Christ” before saying He gave us the ministry of reconciliation.

We aren't standing above sinners calling them upward.

We are people who were reconciled telling other people about the One who reconciled us.

We were wrong.

We needed mercy.

We needed correction.

We needed forgiveness.

We needed Jesus.

And we still do.

That realization should change the tone of every correction we give.

We don't approach people saying:

“Look how much more I know than you.”

We approach them saying:

“Someone came after me too.”

That is the ministry of reconciliation.

And maybe before we correct someone, we should ask ourselves one final question:

Am I trying to win this person—or am I just trying to win this argument?

Because Jesus didn't call us to a ministry of winning arguments.

He called us to represent Him.

He called us to speak truth.

He called us to restore the fallen.

He called us to pursue one another.

And He entrusted us with the ministry of reconciliation.

Correction seeks restoration. Pride seeks recognition. Christ seeks the person.

May our correction always look more like Him.


Pastor Scott



 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page